PRC Documents Regarding the CPE for Guidance & Counseling Part III

It was only after I had these pages blogged that I realized the pages were reversed. This matter is divided into 3 blog entries. I have identified each by the Roman numeral. Pardon the technological glitch here. Thanks.





i. Submission of the proposed budget and seminar or convention fee to be collected shall be reviewed by the Council.
j. Seminar or convention fee to be collected.
k. Evaluation to be used which could either be any of the following modes or systems:
i. evaluation of seminar by participant
ii. evaluation of participants by CPE providers, tests.
iii. other methods of evaluation.
3. If the Council concerned finds the CPE program, activity or source to be relevant to the profession, cost effective to the participants and to be in accordance with these guidelines, said Council shall issue a certificate of accreditation within thirty (30) days from receipt of application.

Section 18. Post-accreditation Requirements. – Upon the completion of an accredited CPE program, activity or source, the CPE Provider shall submit a report to the Council concerned within fifteen (15 days) from the last day of the offering. The report shall include, but shall not be limited to the following information:

1. Name of CPE provider.
2. Name or description of CPE program, activity or source.
3. Accreditation number and date of issuance of accreditation.
4. Certified list of participants indicating names and PRC professional license/identification (ID) cards and expiry dates, resource speakers, lecturers, discussion leaders, panelists, moderators or facilitators who took part or participated in the CPE program, activity or source.
5. Date and time of start and completion of the holding of the CPE program, activity or source.
6. Venue location of the holding of the program.
7. Summary evaluation results and participants.
8. Name of Secretariat representative who monitored the CPE program or activity.

Section 19. Sanctions. –

a. Accredited CPE Provider – Accreditation shall be withdrawn from the Provider who:
1. Is found not complying with the prescribed rules and regulations for CPE, or
2. Has committed substantial deviation from the approved program, or
3. Has submitted false reports, or
4. Has committed such other acts that the Council finds to be in violation of the interest of the program.

b. Commission employees –

Any employee of the Commission who causes, abets or helps in the renewal of the ID card/license of a registered professional without complying with CPE requirements shall be considered to have violated office and/or civil service rules and regulations and shall be proceeded against administratively, and, if found guilty, shall be meted out the penalties provided for by the said laws and rules and regulations.

Nothing follows.

This one below I got from http://www.clinicalcounselor.blogspot.com/ and decided to bring it in here so everyone can read it as well. Hope there is no mistake in the typing here.



Republic of the Philippines
Professional Regulation Commission
Manila

Resolution No. 2009-542 Series of 2009

AMENDING SEC.19(b) of RESOLUTION No. 2008-466 SERIES OF 2008
“Revised Standardized Guidelines and Procedures for the Implementation of the CPE/CPD System for All Registered and Licensed Professionals

WHEREAS, the Commission issued Res. No. 2008-466 Series of 2008, prescribing,
issuing and promulgating the “Revised Standardized Guidelines and Procedures
for the Implementation of the Continuing Professional Education/Development
(CPE/CPD) System for All Registered and Licensed Professionals,” Annex “A”;

WHEREAS, Sec. 19 Sanctions of the aforesaid Resolution states, to wit

“b. Commission employees –

Any employee of the Commission who causes, abets or helps in the renewal of the ID card/license of a registered professional without complying with CPE requirements shall be considered to have violated office and/or civil service rules and regulations and shall be proceeded against administratively, and, if found guilty, shall be meted out the penalties provided for by the said laws and rules and regulations.”

WHEREAS, the aforequoted provision is appropriate if the submission of CPE units requirement for the renewal of the professional identification card (PIC) issued to a registered and licensed professional is a mandatory provision under the concerned PRB, and

WHEREAS, the CPE Task Force decided to recommend to the Commission for the amendment of Section 19 (b);

NOW, THEREFORE, the Commission Resolves, as it is hereby Resolved, to amend Sec. 19 (b) Res. No. 2008-466 Series of 2008 which shall read as follows:

a. Commission employees –

Any employee of the Commission who causes, abets or helps in the renewal of the PROFESSIONAL IDENTIFICATION CARD [license] of a registered and licensed professional without complying with THE MANDATORY CPE REQUIREMENTS UNDER THE PERTINENT PROFESSIONAL REGULATORY LAW (PRL) shall be considered to have violated THE PRL AND ITS IMPLEMENTING RULES AND REGULATIONS (IRR), office and/or civil service rules and regulations and shall be proceeded against CRIMINALLY AND/OR administratively, and, if found guilty, shall be meted out the penalties provided for by the said PRL (laws], IRR, OFFICE and/or CIVIL SERVICE rules and regulations.”